Opening the Wishlist for future OS
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
1:Arpeggiator = making your own arpeggios, and three different arpeggiators at once.
2:Better or more synth waveforms like hypersaw from JP8000 for Trance music.
3:More filters.
4:Make it better than anything else on the market and support it for a very long time.
2:Better or more synth waveforms like hypersaw from JP8000 for Trance music.
3:More filters.
4:Make it better than anything else on the market and support it for a very long time.
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
yes .. but ... apparently, Yamaha owns a patent on multiple arps, from what I've heard and is the reason Fantoms only have one ... btw ... three?
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
Like traxio already said:
1. Arpeggiator: An improvement would be great!
2. The Fantom hasn't got many Euro Dance/Trance oriented waveformes. Maybe an ARX card will be produced?
1. Arpeggiator: An improvement would be great!
2. The Fantom hasn't got many Euro Dance/Trance oriented waveformes. Maybe an ARX card will be produced?
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
I now we are not supposed to chat in this thread, but what is "Euro Dance/Trance oriented waveformes" in your opinion?
There's the 1071-1079 of supersaws and then there are the regular saws at 1258-1288 that you could stack and structure.
I'm interested in hearing what you are missing, **please** start another thread about this if you want to discuss it further. It will be interesting...
There's the 1071-1079 of supersaws and then there are the regular saws at 1258-1288 that you could stack and structure.
I'm interested in hearing what you are missing, **please** start another thread about this if you want to discuss it further. It will be interesting...
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
better sequencer editor. i like how the G can show the keys and durations on a bar like cubase, but you can't drag/drop, lengthen or shorten the note with the click of your mouse.
the event editor (microscope) is ok if we were back in the
MMT8 ages...
the event editor (microscope) is ok if we were back in the
MMT8 ages...
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
jessej!
I did not know about the Supersaws in the waveformlist?
Great, now ihave to test it!
I did not know about the Supersaws in the waveformlist?
Great, now ihave to test it!
Arpeggiator
Hi, Chuck here.
Im new to the forum. G owner.
Yes, I actually heard from Roland that Japan is working on an update for a new arpeggiator for the Fantom-G.
I hope it comes out soon!
Im new to the forum. G owner.
Yes, I actually heard from Roland that Japan is working on an update for a new arpeggiator for the Fantom-G.
I hope it comes out soon!
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
Where did you hear that, Chukk ???
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
Yes, improved arpeggiator is a must!
Diametro
... apparently, Yamaha owns a patent on multiple arps...
This is not the first time I hear it, but it's so confusing to me...how is that possible? I mean, how such 'normal' feature can be patented?
Korg's Karma has multiple arpeggiators but it's a much more advanced concept, does it mean that Korg pays to Yamaha for Karma??
Diametro
... apparently, Yamaha owns a patent on multiple arps...
This is not the first time I hear it, but it's so confusing to me...how is that possible? I mean, how such 'normal' feature can be patented?
Korg's Karma has multiple arpeggiators but it's a much more advanced concept, does it mean that Korg pays to Yamaha for Karma??
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 00:19, 23 August 2006
Improved arpeggiator ...
+1 - I would like this too.
Korg probably gets away from this by claiming that KARMA is not really an arpeggiator - multiple arp engines would be encouraging for us, since now Roland will have to massively redesign their arpeggiator paradigm
!
But for all we know - it 'aint happening this NAMM, and this is just a rumour.
I would be happy with a revamped ROM soundset i.e. either newly designed sounds or best of SRX sounds in the G (I refuse to accept the current sound set as 'SRX best of' - sorry).
Manish
Korg probably gets away from this by claiming that KARMA is not really an arpeggiator - multiple arp engines would be encouraging for us, since now Roland will have to massively redesign their arpeggiator paradigm

But for all we know - it 'aint happening this NAMM, and this is just a rumour.
I would be happy with a revamped ROM soundset i.e. either newly designed sounds or best of SRX sounds in the G (I refuse to accept the current sound set as 'SRX best of' - sorry).

Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
"(I refuse to accept the current sound set as 'SRX best of' - sorry). "
I just have to repeat myself one more time before Namm and agree with you on that one whole heartedly.
Oops. I broke my promise.
Oh well. Namm is very close. I hope it does not cost my entire tax refund, whatever it is.
I just have to repeat myself one more time before Namm and agree with you on that one whole heartedly.
Oops. I broke my promise.
Oh well. Namm is very close. I hope it does not cost my entire tax refund, whatever it is.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 22:53, 23 November 2008
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
Another solution for choosing a tone in the pro-edit menu, scrolling through thousands of waveforms isn't a very good solution?
At least the possibility to jump in categories (like it's with Korg Synths) would be nice!!!
At some points I have to agree with my previous speakers! I sometimes really can't believe that the sounds in the G are "best of SRX"...
I think I fancy myself that even the piano-sounds of my friends' RD700SX are bettersounding at some points....
But I have to underline that at most/other points the G is a monster machine and I love playin' it, as I mentionned several times!
greets
At least the possibility to jump in categories (like it's with Korg Synths) would be nice!!!
At some points I have to agree with my previous speakers! I sometimes really can't believe that the sounds in the G are "best of SRX"...
I think I fancy myself that even the piano-sounds of my friends' RD700SX are bettersounding at some points....
But I have to underline that at most/other points the G is a monster machine and I love playin' it, as I mentionned several times!
greets
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: 19:19, 11 October 2007
- Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
- Contact:
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
Alesis' Synths also separate waveforms into categories.
It is surelly better than that LOOOONG list.
Also, we need to create phrases in different beats, not just 4/4.
Try to record a 3/4 song with 4/4 phrases. It gets really messy!
It is surelly better than that LOOOONG list.
Also, we need to create phrases in different beats, not just 4/4.
Try to record a 3/4 song with 4/4 phrases. It gets really messy!
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
Yeah, that odd behaviour when working with time signatures other than 4/4 must be fixed on the next OS update, along with other issues concerning the Sequencer that we've pointed out so many times.
Now, something else: Does anybody believe that there could be a possibility to see nothing new about the Fantom-G in the upcoming NAMM show?
Now, something else: Does anybody believe that there could be a possibility to see nothing new about the Fantom-G in the upcoming NAMM show?
-
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: 19:02, 15 November 2007
- Location: Hollywood, CA
Re: Opening the Wishlist for future OS
Pharlopez:
Yamaha also patented elements of disk-streaming that preclude others from pulling out Gigastudio-type technology in a keyboard.
Stuff like that slips through all the time. I'm pretty sure Yamaha has a patent on traditional mod and pitch wheels too, but simply licenses that stuff out for cheap or free to companies it doesn't feel is a threat (unlike Roland—the two are considered fierce rivals in Japan).This is not the first time I hear it, but it's so confusing to me...how is that possible? I mean, how such 'normal' feature can be patented?
Yamaha also patented elements of disk-streaming that preclude others from pulling out Gigastudio-type technology in a keyboard.
A lot of time, it's not "multiple arpeggios" in a global sense that's patented—it's a specific implementation that may be limited to keyboard instruments. Korg's Karma may have tweaked the tech enough so there wasn't an infringement. I mean, Karma isn't multiple arpeggiators as much as it's a single arpeggiator controlling multiple parameters across multiple channels. It's all about how you massage the implementation.Korg's Karma has multiple arpeggiators but it's a much more advanced concept, does it mean that Korg pays to Yamaha for Karma??