Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Forum for Fantom-S/S88, Fantom-X6/7/8, Fantom-XR and Fantom-Xa
Post Reply
udo
Posts: 40
Joined: 14:24, 23 September 2005

Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by udo »

hi there!

what sequencer is the fastest and easiest to operate? i am not looking for sophistication, only for speed.

thanks a lot,

udo
User avatar
V-CeeOh
Posts: 3956
Joined: 18:13, 28 September 2004
Location: Portugal

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by V-CeeOh »

Hi udo

I don't know the Triton but if you consider a "press REC - start playing" fast, then the Fantom is for you.


o - ...just could not afford the 8
(
\_/
hear what I've done with the 7
udo
Posts: 40
Joined: 14:24, 23 September 2005

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by udo »

ha, ha.

fixthemix, if you don't know the triton then how can you compare it to the fantom?

seriously, i just wonder how much faster the touchscreen is enabling you to edit your sequences, if so.

please only reply if you have worked with both workstations in arranging and editing songs.

thank you very much.
tcplugin
Posts: 226
Joined: 10:00, 17 December 2004
Location: Netherlands and Belgium
Contact:

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by tcplugin »

I used to have a Triton and now use a Fantom X7. I prefer the Fantom, it has less complicated menu structures, it works faster for me.

Sjaak - Fantom X7,SRX-679 - Sometimes new technology gives us new ways to screw things up
The_Czar
Posts: 438
Joined: 20:38, 27 July 2004
Location: kalamazoo, MI

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by The_Czar »

I haven't used a triton really, but I've used an MPC2000XL, an ASR-X, a Korg Trinity, the fantom, Reason, Pro Tools, an MP-7, and various chinzy PC programs.

I like the fantom sequencer better than the MPC. I like it better than the ASR-X or the MP-7. I like Reason's sequencer better than the fantom. the fantom beats the living shit out of a Trinity.

My opinion is that it's one of the best HW sequencers out there and the only thing beating it is computer programs that can't even begin to offer the same fidelity.

Smoke Club!
www.myspace.com/smokeclubmusic
www.soundclick.com/bands/6/smokeclub
www.sonicbids.com/smokeclub
www.einswear.com
User avatar
V-CeeOh
Posts: 3956
Joined: 18:13, 28 September 2004
Location: Portugal

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by V-CeeOh »

ha ha udo
Then your thread should be "Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencer Arranging and Editing" ;-)
Anyway, you were asking for speed and I didnt compare anything. I just said the Fantom was fast :-)


o - ...just could not afford the 8
(
\_/
hear what I've done with the 7
udo
Posts: 40
Joined: 14:24, 23 September 2005

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by udo »

yes, fixthemix i should have been more specific, sorry.

thanks a lot for your replies.

so the fantom's sequencing is faster? from my experience with the v-synth's touchscreen i would have thought that this feature would give the triton an advantage.

when i tried the fantom it was really weird that i had to use the buttons, that seemed more complicated. but you guys say that the stucture of the fantom's sequencer is better?
bassman
Posts: 2509
Joined: 22:30, 5 September 2004
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by bassman »

udo,

Yep. The Fantom's interface and sequencer were one of the main reasons I purchased my X6 a year ago. The sound quality also played a major part.

I spent a couple of months going through the process of comparing the 'Big 3', Motif/Fantom/Triton Extreme. My first choice (by reading and hype only) was the Triton. After spending time at the local music shop playing and comparing, that quickly changed.

The touch screen really didn't factor much in my decision. Just how much time would I save (a few seconds, maybe) and would that matter to me at all in creating my music? Nope!

I find navigation on the Fantom's sequencing section to be quite nice. A few button presses don't change my musical world.

Bassman
buzzbro
Posts: 167
Joined: 20:27, 30 May 2003
Location: Canada

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by buzzbro »

I have a Fantom S88 and a Korg Triton Studio 88. Although both can get pretty efficient after you get used to them, I mainly like the Triton better because it easier to do multitrack pattrns and chain them together. Also I find assigning effects to be easier. The touchscreen also makes a small difference.

As well, the Triton can hold a bunch of songs in memory at once, instead of just one. Andl, the Triton doesn't care where you store your sequences - they can be in any folder.

But having said that, they're both very good workstation sequencers.

bb
The Box Drone
Posts: 371
Joined: 21:38, 8 August 2005
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by The Box Drone »

My roommate has a Triton, so essentially I've had one in my house for a good four months.... I NEVER figured out how to use it, even with my roommates instruction.

A week after I bought my Fantom Xa (and the Xa is actually marginally more complicated to operate than than the X6-7-8), I was sampling, sequencing, and making songs.

Mind you I spent more time with the Fantom, but the fact is that whenever I said down with the triton I just found myself confused & overwhelmed, and it put me right off... the Fantom was very inviting and intuitive.... it didn't scare me off like the Triton did.
antonblack
Posts: 5
Joined: 19:43, 5 October 2005

Re: Fantom X vs. Triton Sequencing

Post by antonblack »

I had a TRITON and to be hons i found it a lot easier to use.
If i could afford it I would have another one as well as my x6.
Post Reply