Search found 3 matches
- 16:51, 25 July 2006
- Forum: V-Synth
- Topic: What should the VC-3 be?
- Replies: 65
- Views: 5168
Re: What should the VC-3 be?
<t>Hugo,<br/> <br/> Thanks very much for the good suggestion, but I've known about the EMU function for a little while. I used to own a E4Xt, and I didn't like it all that much (I had a lemon of a unit, and it was a sour experience). The morphing I'm talking about is real-time. I'm not sure if the V...
- 07:53, 25 July 2006
- Forum: V-Synth
- Topic: What should the VC-3 be?
- Replies: 65
- Views: 5168
Re: What should the VC-3 be?
<t>Nathan, thanks for the kind welcome.<br/> <br/> I would be thrilled if they kept up with the unit's strengths, as you described so well, no matter what they come out with. As long as it's really innovative, and not a re-run or step backwards, then I'm sure we're going to like it.<br/> <br/> Thank...
- 01:51, 25 July 2006
- Forum: V-Synth
- Topic: What should the VC-3 be?
- Replies: 65
- Views: 5168
Re: What should the VC-3 be?
<t>Don't know if anyone else has mentioned this...<br/> <br/> I'm really interested in high quality sound morphing, like the Kyma does. It would be really fantastic if Roland could implement such functionality! I for one really didn't purchase the V-synth to have yet another VA emulator, or retro sy...